Home   Science      Methods    Theories    Skepticism   Intuition     Genes & Heredity  Variation               Inheritance           Evolution       The Fact of Evolution  Evidence for Evolution Speciation Speciation: Patterns  Speciation: Rates  Mechanisms    Fitness     Natural Selection  Other Causes    Modern Synthesis   Ecology       Energy       Interactions  Tradeoffs     References    About TVOL    Bibliography  Glossary       
Mechanisms: Theories to Explain How Evolution Happens
Fitness
Maximizing Reproductive Success
 

Although the phrase “survival of the fittest” appears nowhere in Darwin’s Origin of Species[*], it has become synonymous with the term “natural selection” in the minds of many. The phrase is not only an inaccurate summary of Darwin’s theory, its common usage often implies that “only the strong survive” or a similar misunderstanding of the term “fitness”. Just what is fitness, anyway? And, if not size or strength, then what qualities make an individual “fit”?

Differential Reproductive Success
Biologists define fitness as the genetic contribution of an individual to future generations, and it is typically measured as the number of offspring that reach reproductive age[#](Gotelli 2001). With this definition it becomes clear just why “survival of the fittest” is inaccurate: the theory of evolution by natural selection focuses primarily on reproductive success, not survival. Surviving is certainly important, inasmuch as it improves the likelihood that an individual will reproduce (or continue to reproduce). But survival is a means to an end (reproduction), not an end in itself. In fact, sexual selection in some species, such as frigate birds or birds of paradise, often leads to traits that actually decrease the chances of survival of the male. But they increase reproductive success.

Evolution happens because of differential reproductive success. Some individuals possess traits that increase the probability that they will successfully reproduce. Others lack those traits or possess traits that make them less likely to reproduce.

The end result is that the genetic makeup of the population changes over time because some individuals pass on their genes to a greater number of offspring[#](Endler 1986)(Futuyma 1998). Over time, some traits (and their underlying genes) disappear while other traits become more and more common in successive generations, and may eventually be found in every individual.

Genes that increase fitness (as defined above) tend to be preserved and increase in frequency.

Fitness is context-dependent
Being the biggest or strongest (or longest survivor) does not necessarily increase reproductive success. Fitness is always dependent on context (the full set of conditions a population exists under). Traits that increase fitness for individuals of one species may be of no value or detrimental to individuals of other species.

Some of the many factors upon which fitness depends:

There are certainly more, but the point is that with so many combinations possible for all of these factors, there are many and diverse conditions that impact whether, how often and how successfully individuals reproduce. Size and strength may be advantageous for a few species, but certainly they are unimportant to most others. What matters is that some individuals in a population have traits that improve their reproductive output, which means that relatively more individuals in the next generation carry the genes for those traits. Any trait that results in relatively more offspring than others in the population will tend to persist and become more common.

It is also important to remember that if we want to talk about the “fittest,” we make the comparison among individuals of the same species in a population, not among members of different species. A weasel may be an efficient predator, but it is not “more fit” than the mice it catches. Prey that escape are not “more fit” than the predator. But some mice are faster or more agile or better able to find food or mates, and by leaving more offspring they prove more fit than other mice in the population.

 

Spencer, RJ. 2002. Experimentally testing nest site selection: Fitness trade-offs and predation risk in turtles. Ecology 83: 2136-2144

Arntz, AM, EH Delucia, & N Jordan. 1998. Contribution of photosynthetic rate to growth and reproduction in Amaranthus hybridus. Oecologia 117: 323-330

 
*In the 6th edition of the book, Darwin finally adopted the term, which had become commonly used to describe natural selection.
   
   Home   Science      Methods    Theories    Skepticism   Intuition     Genes & Heredity  Variation               Inheritance           Evolution       The Fact of Evolution  Evidence for Evolution Speciation Speciation: Patterns  Speciation: Rates  Mechanisms    Fitness     Natural Selection  Other Causes    Modern Synthesis   Ecology       Energy       Interactions  Tradeoffs     References    About TVOL    Bibliography  Glossary    
Copyright © 2007 Michael Kreuzer, Jr.